The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was present but showed inability to argue the matter.
None. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
4-sa-525-1995.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 525 OF 1995
Usman Ismail Bagwan (Since Deceased) through LRs. & Ors. ..Appellants Vs. Mahiboobi W/o. Abbas Shaikh (Since Deceased) through LRs. and Ors. ..Respondents
Ms. Naiana Boraste i/b. R. M. Agrawal, for the Appellants. Mr. Rohan Surve, for the Respondent Nos.1C to 1F.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 14 FEBRUARY 2024
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.02.1417:42:23+0530
P.C.
. Earlier none appeared for the appellants and the matter was posted for dismissal. Today, Ms. Naina Boraste, learned counsel for the appellants is present, however, she has shown her inability to argue the matter. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Usman Ismail Bagwan (Since Deceased) through LRs. & Ors.
Mahiboobi W/o. Abbas Shaikh (Since Deceased) through LRs. and Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
