Writ petition by S V Infratech against the State of Maharashtra disposed of without adjudication after counsel reported that the disputes had been settled per Consent Terms tendered to the bench. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
927-WP-13822-2023.DOC
S.R.JOSHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 13822 OF 2023
S V Infratech … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others …Respondents
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA RAJNIKANT RAJNIKANT JOSHI JOSHI Date: 2024.01.30 17:01:48 +0530
Mr. Narendra V. Walawalkar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suresh Sabrad and Mr. Amey Sawant, for the Petitioner. Ms. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Mayur Joglekar i/b. Mr. D. J. Bhanage, for Respondent No.3.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 25th JANUARY, 2024
P.C.
We are informed by Mr. Walavalkar, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner that the disputes between the parties stand settled in terms of the Consent Terms. A copy of the Consent Terms is tendered by Mr. Walawalkar.
2 The Writ Petition hence would not warrant any adjudication. It is accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 1 of 1 25 January, 2024
S V Infratech
The State of Maharashtra
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
