The petition was allowed to be withdrawn on the ground that the prayers had become infructuous. The petition was disposed of without order as to costs.
Leave to withdraw the petition allowed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-1129-2024.DOC
Ashvini Narwade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDITION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1129 OF 2024
Vijjaykumar Harichand Gandhi
… Petitioner
Versus
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority …Respondents
Ms. Vidhi Punmiya a/w. Mr. Sanket S. Bora i/b. SPCM Legal for the Petitioner.
Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. a/w. Ms. P. J. Gavhane AGP for Respondent-State.
Digitally signed by ASHVINI ASHVINI BAPPASAHEB BAPPASAHEB KAKDE KAKDE Date: 2024.01.29 11:23:33 +0530
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 25th JANUARY, 2024
P.C.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 1 of 1 25th January, 2024
Vijjaykumar Harichand Gandhi
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority
G. S. KULKARNI
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
