Common adjournment order: due to paucity of time the Bombay High Court adjourned listed matters to dates fixed per CIS and continued any operative interim or ad-interim relief until the respective next dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-10-24 paucity common order.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION AND
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMON ORDER
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 9th October 2024.
P.C. :
On account of paucity of time, rest of the matters on Daily and Supplementary Board stand adjourned on the dates fixed as per the CIS.
| Sr. Nos | C.I.S. Date |
|---|---|
| 33, 70 (Appellate Side) | 16/10/2024 |
| 27, 51 (Appellate Side) | 23/10/2024 |
| 31, 41, 45, 46, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 68, 69 (Appellate Side) |
13/11/2024 |
| 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 56, 58, 64, 67 (Original Side) |
13/11/2024 |
If in any of the above matters, ad-interim relief or interim relief is operative till today, the same will continue to operate till the respective next dates. If ad-interim relief is not granted for a limited period, the said orders will remain unaffected.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J] [A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
1/1
Signed by: Diksha Rane Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/10/2024 11:37:13
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
