In this writ petition, the petitioner instructed counsel to withdraw the petition as suit premises possession was handed over. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-wp-8781-2017.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.01.17 18:56:33 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8781 OF 2017
Makbul Mehebub Khan ...Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Sachin Pawar i.b Adv. Chetan Agrawal for the Petitioner.
Mr. Makbul Khan – Petitioner present in Court.
Mr. C. D. Mali – AGP for the State - Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 16TH JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :-
Agrawal appears for the Petitioner and informs this Court that the Petitioner is present in Court, who has instructed him to
withdraw this Writ Petition, as the possession of the suit premises has been already handed over to Respondent No.4.
1/2
10-wp-8781-2017.doc
withdrawn.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Makbul Mehebub Khan
The State of Maharashtra
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
