Disposed

Rajendra Vishwanath Adake v. Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Oct 2024WP/12793/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions challenged orders of the Deputy and Joint Charity Commissioners confirming decisions in Change Report No.439 of 2022 concerning a trust. On the contesting respondent's consent offer, both writ petitions were disposed of by setting aside those orders and remanding change report proceedings for fresh decision within one month.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rajendra Vishwanath Adake vs Bhogawati Shikshan… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

4 and 15-wp-450-2024-12793-2024.doc

¶2

Shubhada S Kadam

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 450 OF 2024

¶5

Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar through Trustee S. S. Patil

¶6

… Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

Jaysing Gopalrao Jadhav Hujare and ors.

¶9

…. Respondents

¶10

with

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 12793 OF 2024

¶12

Rajendra Vishwanath Adake … Petitioner

¶13

versus

¶14

Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal …. Respondents Shahunagar through Trustee S. S. Patil and ors.

¶15

Mr. S.S. Patwardhan with Mr. Chetan Patil i/b. Mr. Mandar G.Bagkar, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP/450/2024 and for Respondent No.2 in WP/12793/2024.

¶16

Mr. Manoj Sable, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 and 7 in WP/450/2024. Mr. Budhabhushan Rajratna, Advocate for Respondent No.9 in WP/450/2024.

¶17

Mr. Hiten Venegavkar along with Mr. Kamar Ali Shaikh, Advocate for Respondent No.29 in WP/450/2024,

¶18

Mr. Hiten Venegavkar along with Mr. Kamar Ali Shaikh, Advocates for Petitioner in WP/12793/2024.

¶19

Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent Nos.31 and 32/State in WP/450/2024.

¶20

Mr. J. P. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos.31 and 32/State in WP/12793/2024.

¶21

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

¶22

SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM

¶23

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2024.09.12 15:39:58 +0530

¶24

DATE : 11^th SEPTEMBER, 2024.

¶25

P.C. :

¶26

These petitions take exception to the orders dated 31^st August

¶27

1/3

¶28

4 and 15-wp-450-2024-12793-2024.doc

¶29

Shubhada S Kadam

¶30

2023 passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Kolhapur, whereby the order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner in Change Report No.439 of 2022 was confirmed.

¶31

Learned counsel for both sides were heard substantially.

¶32

Mr. Venegavkar, learned counsel for contesting respondent in Writ Petition No.450 of 2024, on instructions, makes statement that in order to avoid further consumption of time, this respondent is ready to give consent for setting-aside the order passed by the Deputy Charity Commissioner below Exhibit-28 as well as Exhibit-1 in Change Report No.439 of 2022 provided that the said proceedings are directed to be concluded within a period of one month.

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.450 of 2024 records not objection there for.

¶34

In view of the above, without going into the contentions sought to be raised by the rival parties, the order dated 19^th April 2023 passed below Exhibit-28 and Exhibit-1 in Change Report No.439 of 2022 as well as order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner dated 31^st August 2023 are hereby set-aside.

¶35

The proceedings of Change Report No.439 of 2022 are relegated back to the Deputy Charity Commissioner for decision afresh on the point of Exhibit-28 as well Exhibit-1 on merit.

¶36

2/3

¶37

4 and 15-wp-450-2024-12793-2024.doc

¶38

Shubhada S Kadam

¶39

The parties are directed to appear before the authority on 18^th September 2024. The Deputy Charity Commissioner is directed to decide the said proceedings finally in accordance with law within a period of one month therefrom.

¶40

At this stage, Mr. Venegavkar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent in Writ Petition No.450 of 2024, requests for continuation of the arrangement of de facto trustees to manage the affairs of the trust.

¶41

Without going into the correctness of their appointment, this Court finds that since undisputedly they are functioning for a period of a year now, the said arrangement to continue for a period of two weeks. It is open for the contesting respondent in Writ Petition No.450 of 2024 to move appropriate application before the Deputy Charity Commissioner to seek further order in this regard.

¶42

The petitions stands disposed of in above terms.

¶43

(R. M. JOSHI, J.)

¶44

3/3

Rajendra Vishwanath Adake v. Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rajendra Vishwanath Adake v. Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Madhav Subhash Ogale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sultana Raj @ Rajmohammed Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Surendra Nathamal Lunkad and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhogawati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Shahunagar Thr Trustee S.S. Patil vs Jaysing Gopalrao Jadhav Hujare and Ors.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (Msrtc), Nashik Thr.Divisional Controller vs Nathu Shivram Jagtap(Deceased-Deleted and Anr.)

Vijay Chandrakant Supekar vs the State of Maharashtra