Shaikh Satim Ali Tauseef v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order: multiple matters could not be heard for want of time; office objections to be removed in two weeks, interim orders continue, affidavits filed before next date, and matters assigned future listing dates by category.
What the court decided
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
&
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE :- 14TH NOVEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- The matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5
hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing, due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As
such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order,
Coram
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Eden Castle vs Darshan Sagar Developers
Devi Constructions Limited Liability Partnership through Vinod K Baney vs State of Maharashtra through the Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.
Devi Constructions Limited Liability Partnership vs State of Maharashtra through the Revenue and Forest Dep and Ors.
Mehta Building Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) vs State of Maharashtra