Alfaj Abubakar Mulla v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/12544/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Common order listing various matters for hearing due to admission or I.A. orders. Directed removal of office objections within two weeks.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitallysigned byNIKITAKAILASDARADEDate:2024.11.2917:03:13+0530
¶4
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
¶5
DATE :- 22nd NOVEMBER, 2024
¶6
Per Court :-
¶7
- At the time of rising at 5.30 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶8
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶9
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶10
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vijay Bharat Mahadik vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec. School Education Dept and Ors.
Dayanand Ramappa Gwadi vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.
Shraddha Abhijit Kumbhar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.
Sudarshan Sharad Mohite and Ors. vs the School Education Nd Sport Dept. and Ors.