Dismissed

Mulchand Phulchand Krishi Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Authorised Signatory, Meet Ashoak Agrawal v. the State of Maharashtra, (Thr. Its Secretary), Industrial Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC25 Jun 2024WP/1249/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a 2018 panchanama taking over possession of allotted property and refusal of extension. The court found no challenge to the panchanama and noted delay and laches, and dismissed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mulchand Phulchand Krishi Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Authorised… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 WP-1249-2024.odt

¶2

2024:BHC-NAG:6494-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1249 OF 2024

¶5

[Mulchand Phulchand Krishi Udyog Pvt. Ltd., through its Authorized Signatory- Meet
Ashok Agrawal VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Industrial
Department, Mumbai and others]

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Shri K.S. Agrawal and Shri C.S. Tamhane, Counsel for Petitioner.
Shri H.R. Dhumale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.

¶8

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

¶9

DATE : 25th JUNE, 2024

¶10

1. It is not in dispute that the panchanama taking over possession of the

¶11

property, which was allotted in favour of the petitioner by the respondent No.3,
was drawn on 16-2-2018 is not a fact in dispute. Also, there is no challenge to

¶12

the panchanama whereby the possession was taken over in 2018.

¶13

2. Apart from above, there appears to be delay and laches on the part of the petitioner in questioning the order of taking over possession and refusing to grant extension.

¶14

3. That being so, no case is made out for interference. The petition is dismissed.

¶15

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶16

LANJEWAR

Mulchand Phulchand Krishi Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Authorised Signatory, Meet Ashoak Agrawal v. the State of Maharashtra, (Thr. Its Secretary), Industrial Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mulchand Phulchand Krishi Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Authorised Signatory, Meet Ashoak Agrawal v. the State of Maharashtra, (Thr. Its Secretary), Industrial Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Pratapsingh S/O Vithalsingh Belode Vs Directorate of Vocational Education and Training, through Its Director, Mumbai and 4 Others

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Katol, Nagpur Thr. Chairman Charansingh B. Thakur and Anr. Vs Anup Kumar, Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Marketing, Mumbai and Anr.

Kalpesh S. Mandlik and Another vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Maha. Rail Infrastructure Devpt. Corp. Ltd., Thr. Asst. Manager and Ors.

Manoj Ghanshyamdas Sawal Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Mumbai and Another

Ku. Srushti Rajendrakumar Dadmal Vs the S.T. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur through Its Member Secretary, Gondia and Another

Parul W/O Sanjay Patel and Others Vs State of Maha., Department of Urban Development and Town Planning through Secretary and Others