M a Enterprises v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought directions to respondents to furnish the Commissioner's authorisation and written reasons to believe for blocking their Input Tax Credit under GST. Respondents undertook to provide the documents by 20 September 2024; matter adjourned to 14 October 2024 with liberty to file reply and rejoinder affidavits.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sayyed
Sr.927 to 929.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12475 OF 2024
M/s. New Global Tex ...Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents
AND WRIT PETITION NO.12476 OF 2024
Mariyam Fabtex ...Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.12477 OF 2024
M. A. Enterprises ...Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi a/w Ms.Rouble A. Chhabra, Ms. Aarya More and Ms. Meenal Songire for Petitioner in all petitions. Ms. S. D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. a/w Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, AGP for RespondentState in WP/12475/2024 and WP/12476/2024.
Ms. S. D. Vyas, Addl. G. P. a/w Mr. Prashant P. More, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/12477/2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. New Global Tex
- petitioner
Mariyam Fabtex
- petitioner
M. A. Enterprises
- respondent
Union of India & Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
20 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Abdeali Kanchwalla vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board
Mohamed Riyaz Shaikh vs the Chief Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board
Ismail a. Petiwala vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
Imagicaaworld Entertainment Limited (Earlier Known as Adlabs Entertainment Limited) vs Union of India, through Secretary