Writ petition against the State of Maharashtra was withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel stated that subsequent developments rendered it infructuous; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33 wp 1232-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE
Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.10.15 16:24:10 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1232 OF 2024
Ashutosh Krushna Gadling .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Adv. Vikram Undre for the Petitioner.
Adv. S. D. Vyas, Addl.G.P. a/w V. R. Raje, AGP for the Respondent.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ.
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2024
due to subsequent developments, the above Writ Petition has been rendered
infructuous. He, therefore sought leave to withdraw the above Writ Petition.
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Page 1 of 2 OCTOBER 14, 2024
Laxmi
33 wp 1232-24.doc
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
[B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 OCTOBER 14, 2024
Laxmi
Ashutosh Krushna Gadling
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
