Rahul Sukhadeo Navale v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, Higher and Technical Edu. and Employment Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC18 Nov 2024WP/12204/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions by employees seeking payment of dues from an educational institution's management. The management had disbursed only part of the court-directed Rs.9 crores; on its counsel's statement that compliance would occur by 31 December 2024, the matter was listed for 3 January 2025 with a warning of contempt proceedings.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Rahul Sukhadeo Navale vs the State of Maharashtra Thr… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6765 OF 2018

¶4

Suman Sachin Jain and Ors. …..Petitioners

¶5

NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADEDate: 2024.12.1918:04:25 +0530

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2127 OF 2018

¶10

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.6765 OF 2018

¶12

WITH

¶13

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.209 OF 2021

¶14

WITH

¶15

WRIT PETITION (ST.) 215 OF 2021

¶16

WITH

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO.11657 OF 2024

¶18

WITH

¶19

WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO.6104 OF 2022

¶20

WITH

¶21

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.6144 OF 2022

WITH

1 of 7

Nikita

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO.6767 OF 2018

¶27

WITH

¶28

WRIT PETITION NO12259 OF 2024

¶29

WITH

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO.12204 OF 2024

¶31

WITH

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO.12840 OF 2024

¶33

WITH

¶34

WRIT PETITION NO.6080 OF 2021

¶35

WITH

¶36

WRIT PETITION NO.6082 OF 2021

¶37

WITH

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO.6081 OF 2021

¶39

WITH

¶40

WRIT PETITION NO.4410 OF 2024

¶41

WITH

¶42

WRIT PETITION NO.14687 OF 2023

¶43

WITH

¶44

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.14766 OF 2024

¶45

¶46

WRIT PETITION NO.14687 OF 2023

¶47

2 of 7

¶48

Nikita

¶49

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶50

Adv. Suresh Pakale a/w Adv. Netra Tembe a/w Adv. Nilesh Desai a/w Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar for the Petitioner.

¶51

Adv. Ajit J. Kenjale a/w Adv. S. M. Gulabani a/w Adv. Suraj Bansode a/w Sai Kadam for the Petitioner in WP/11657/2024.

¶52

Senior Advocate Mr. V. P. Sawant, a/w Mr. Nitin Dhumal for the Applicant in interim application.

¶53

Adv. Rajendra Anbhule a/w Adv. Nisha Ahire for Respondent No.5 in WP/6765/2018 and for Respondent No.4 in WP/6767/2018.

¶54

Ms. Anjali Neel Helekar for Respondent No.3 in WP/4410/202 and WP6104/2022.

¶55

Adv. Swetabja Mondal i/b Rui Rodrigues for Respondent No.3 in WP/6767/2018.

¶56

Adv. Rahul Kamerkar a/w Aparajita R. Jha for Respondent No.2 in WP/6082/2021 and WP/15687/2021.

¶57

Mr.. P. P. Kakade Add. G. P. a/w P.M. J. Deshpande AGP for the State in WP/6765/2018.

¶58

Mr. M. M. Pable AGP for the State in WP(st)/209/2021.

¶59

Mr. V. M. Mali AGP for the State in SP(st)/215/2021.

¶60

Mr. A. R. Deolekar AGP for the State in WP(st.) 61442022 and WP/11657/2024.

¶61

Ms. N. M. Mehra AGP for the State in WP(st.) No.6104/2022. Ane WP/6767/2018.

¶62

Ms. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for the State in WP/12259/2024.

¶63

Mr. A. K. Naik AGP for the State in WP/12204.2024 and

¶64

3 of 7

¶65

Nikita

¶66

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶67

WP/12840/2024.

¶68

Ms. A. A. Purav AGP for the State in WP/6080/2021 and WP/6082/2021.

¶69

Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for the State in WP/4410/2024.

¶70

Mr. V. G. Badgujar AGP for the State in WP/14687/2023 and IA/14766/2024.

¶71

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶72

DATE : 17^th DECEMBER, 2024

¶73

P.C. :-

¶74

By consent of the parties de-tagged Writ Petition

¶75

No.11657 of 2024 and stand over to 15^th January 2025.

¶76

These matters are circulated by the Petitioners on

¶77

account of the disobedience of the direction of this Court set out in paragraphs No.7A of the order dated 19 November, 2024 passed in Interim Application No.14766 of 2024 in Writ Petition No.14687 of 2023, filed by the Sinhgad Technical Education Society.

¶78

The learned Senior Advocate Mr. Pakale reminds us of his earlier contention that this Management will bring in such reasons and cite such circumstances, so as to artificially justify the

¶79

4 of 7

¶80

Nikita

¶81

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶82

non-payment of the dues of the employees. He also reminds us that he had made a statement on the last date that though this Court has issued directions in the order dated 19^th November, 2024, the institution would disobey them.

¶83

In paragraph No.7, we had directed the Management to pay/disburse Rs.9 Crores to the Petitioners in such proportions as the amounts were payable to them, by 14^th December, 2024. As against Rs.9 Crores, Rs.72,66,719/- were disbursed to the Petitioners. He, therefore, submits that his words have come true when he had stated on 19^th November, 2024 that this Management will dodge the payments.

¶84

The learned Senior Advocate for the Management submits that as on date an amount of Rs.2 Crores and some odd amount has been accumulated and the said amount would be paid to these Petitioners. He is under instructions from the President of the Institution that the order of this Court dated 19^th November, 2024 would be complied with by 31^st December, 2024.

¶85

The learned Senior Advocate, on behalf of the

¶86

5 of 7

¶87

Nikita

¶88

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶89

Petitioners, insists that the President and Secretary of the Education Institution should submit an undertaking. The learned Senior Advocate representing the institution submits that there is no need to issue an undertaking since a serious effort is being made for collecting the funds in order to comply with the directions of this Court set out in the order dated 19^th November, 2024.

¶90

Considering the rival submissions and upon perusing the record, we find that this Court had given a long rope to the Management, by trusting the statements made by the Management for the purpose of resolving the issue. Gradually, we are moving towards crystallization of an opinion that this Management is doing too little to abide by the orders of this Court.

¶91

Since the learned Senior Advocate has made a statement on behalf of the Management, on instruction, that the order of this Court would be complied with by 31^st December, 2024 that we are listing this proceedings on 3^rd January, 2025 in the urgent orders category.

¶92

Taking into account several opportunities granted, if the

¶93

6 of 7

¶94

Nikita

¶95

909-wp-along with other.odt

¶96

order dated 19^th November, 2024 is not complied with by 31^st December, 2024 we would be constrained to initiate actions for disobedience of the directions of this Court, against the President Prof. M.N Navale, the Secretary Dr. Ms. Sunanda Navale, and the Directors/ Trustees of the Sinhgad Technical Education Institution.

¶97

The Petitioners have tendered an additional affidavit

¶98

from page Nos. 848 to 875.

¶99

Stand over to 3^rd January, 2025 in the urgent orders

¶100

category.

¶101

List the Writ Petitions along with Writ Petition No. 14887 of 2023 and Writ Petition No.14889 of 2024 also on 3^rd

¶102

January, 2025.

¶103

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶104

7 of 7

¶105

Nikita

Rahul Sukhadeo Navale v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, Higher and Technical Edu. and Employment Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Rahul Sukhadeo Navale v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, Higher and Technical Edu. and Employment Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vishal S/O Manjabapu Chitale and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, School Edu. and Sport Dept. and Ors.

Santosh Uttam Pawar vs State of Maharashtra

High Brow Market Research Investment Advisor Pvt. Ltd. vs Arun Seth and Anr.

Balkrishna Shankar Kanase and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary School Education and Sports Dept. and Ors.

Amol Rama Khande vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Sharmila Dhanapal Nandre and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.