Union of India challenged a Revenue Minister's appellate order for failing to consider its documents; this Court quashed and set aside the order and remitted the matter to the Revenue Minister, keeping all merits contentions expressly open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1220 OF 2024
The Union of India
.Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
.Respondents
______________________________________________________________ Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w. Mr. D. P. Singh, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 – State
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 27.08.2024
P. C.
has been submitted in the proceeding, however, none of the documents
Page No. 1
Anand
are considered by the Hon’ble Revenue Minister.
the Hon’ble Revenue Minister in Appeal-2616/Pra.Kra. 19/J-3 is hereby quashed & set aside and the matter is remitted to the Hon’ble Revenue Minister.
2021 does not survive and the same stands disposed of accordingly.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page No. 2
Anand
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Revenue Minister's order dated 01.11.2018 in Appeal-2616/Pra.Kra. 19/J-3 is valid despite not considering the documents submitted by the Union of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Union of India
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
