The High Court of Bombay disposed of five connected writ petitions to which the petitioner appeared in person, agreeing to the submission that they became infructuous upon the disposal of the underlying appeal.
All writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-WP-11655-2022.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.01.05 11:40:57 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.11655 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11657 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11659 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.12003 OF 2022 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11660 OF 2022
Harbhajan Singh B Ajimal ...Petitioner V/s. Rajnarayan Sankatha Pathak Decd. Thr. L.R. - Smt. Hemlata Rajnarayna Pathak and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Harbhajan Singh B. Ajimal - Petitioner in person present in all the WPs.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 4TH JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :-
Writ Petition were filed against the interlocutory order passed
by the Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes, Mumbai.
1/2
901-WP-11655-2022.doc
He further submits that during the pendency of these Petitions,
the original Appeal has been disposed by an order dated 17 October 2023. He submits that therefore, the present Writ Petitions have become infructuous and hence he wants to withdraw the same.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
HARBHAJAN SINGH B. AJIMAL
HEMLATA RAJNARAYNA PATHAK AND ANR.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
