Maruti Sitaram Acharekar, Thr. Ganesh Maruti Acharekar v. Madhar Madhukar Madaye
Case brief
What is this about?
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-ia20-24.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.20 OF 2024 IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.276 OF 2017
Ganesh M. Acharekar ...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Digitally signed VASANTANANDRAOIDHOL by VASANTANANDRAOIDHOLDate:2024.01.02 19:30:01 +0530
Maruti S. Acharekar ...Applicant (Ori.Respdt.) V/s. Madhav M. Madaye ...Respondent
Mr.Sushil A. Inamdar for the Applicant.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 2ND JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :-
legal heirs of the sole deceased Applicant. Advocate for the Applicant submits that there is no delay in filing this Interim Application.
1/2
22-ia20-24.doc
Application. Case is made out to allow this Interim Application. The Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. Advocate for the Applicant is directed to serve the amended copy of the Civil Revision Application on the sole Respondent.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Ganesh M. Acharekar
Maruti S. Acharekar
Madhav M. Madaye
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court