Adjournment order in a writ petition. Respondent No.5's counsel was unwell; its affidavit in reply was to be served on the petitioners and AGP. State to file its affidavit in reply with pagination by a fixed date, and the petition was listed for further hearing in the urgent category.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.11.25 18:16:13 +0530
Trupti 1 48-wp11477-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11477 OF 2024
Gulbasha Shahajahan Shaikh & Ors. … Petitioners versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate with Mr.Akhil Kupade for the Petitioners.
Ms.Ashwini A.Purav, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4-State.
Ms.Sejal A. Hariyan i/b. M/s. P. Padmanabh & Associates for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 21ST NOVEMBER, 2024
P.C.:
personal difficulty on account of illness.
on the Petitioners and the learned AGP.
filed within one week.
Trupti 2 48-wp11477-2024.odt
category.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE,J.) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
Gulbasha Shahajahan Shaikh & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
