2) Now when the Petitioner is called upon to vacate Unit No.609, he has filed the present petition complaining that since a stranger is occupying Unit No.203, he is unable to vacate Unit No.609. Though the name of the said stranger is pleaded by the Petitioner in para-15(xii) as Kanti Patel, the Petitioner has not bothered to implead Kanti Patel as a party Respondent to the present petition. In my view therefore, the petition filed by the Petitioner deserves to be dismissed as the objective of the Petitioner is just to protect possession of Unit No.609 and he is not making any efforts to ensure that he gets possession of Unit No.203. Infact, the prayers made in the present petition do not reflect that the Petitioner is desirous of occupying Unit No.203. The petition as drafted appears to be totally misconceived deserving its outright rejection. Though, lottery and allotment of rehab residential units is required to be done by Assistant Registrar, SRA, the Petitioner has not bothered to implead SRA as party Respondent to the petition. This is yet another reason why the petition deserves dismissal.
