Rupali Hanmant Gaikwad v. 1. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1110/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listing order: matters could not be heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders continue, pleadings to be filed, and board-wise listing dates assigned. Decides no substantive issue.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Talwalkar .. 1 .. common order 2
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶4
DATE :- 12TH NOVEMBER, 2024
¶5
Per Court :-
¶6
- At the time of rising at 5.45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶7
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶8
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
¶9
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
¶10
before the next date.
¶11
- Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Abbas Aabid Hussain Chawre vs the State of Maharahtra Thr Municipal Commissioner and Anr.
Sagar Dilip Gavhane vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, School Edu. Dept. and Ors.
Abbas Aabid Hussain Chawre vs the State of Maharahtra Thr Municipal Commissioner and Anr.
Reshu Singh vs Union of India through the Secretary, Human Resource Department, Ministry of Education