A writ petition filed by the petitioner was withdrawn with liberty to avail of available remedies, as sought by counsel. The court disposed of the matter accordingly.
Petition withdrawn with liberty to avail of remedy as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:26481
1 corrected wp 11050.24
Corrected order
Corrections have been carried out in view of speaking to minutes order dated 24.10.2024.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11050 OF 2024
Aruna Suryabhan Katore .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Dattatraya S. Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. R. Yadav Lonikar, A.G.P. for the Respondents/State. Shri V. H. Dighe, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 22 OCTOBER 2024.
FINAL ORDER :
. The learned advocate for the petitioner on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail of remedy as is available in law.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ]
bsb/Oct. 24
Aruna Suryabhan Katore
The State of Maharashtra and others
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
