The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition as infructuous because the respondent, in whose favour possession and cancellation of an affidavit were ordered, deceased during the pendency of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed byVARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date:2024.02.23 10:53:34 +0530
42-wp-11038-2023.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11038 OF 2023
Rajesh Kashinath Gupta and Anr … Petitioners
vs.
Kashinath Rajaram Gupta and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Sujay Gawade a/w. Ms. Mudita Pawar i/b. Shree & Co. for Petitioner.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 20th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C. :-
Page no. 1 of 2
42-wp-11038-2023.doc
respondent no.1. By impugned order, directions are issued regarding cancellation of affidavit-cum-indemnity which was executed in favour of petitioner no.1 and directions are issued for handing over possession by the petitioners and respondent no.3 to respondent no.1, who was the Senior Citizen.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 2 of 2
Rajesh Kashinath Gupta
Kashinath Rajaram Gupta
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
