Disposed

Vasantdada Patil Pratisthan Trust Mumbai and Ors. v. Nandkumar M Katkar and Anr.

Bombay HC16 Feb 2024WP/4495/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court did not decide any question of general application. A petition challenging rejection of a preliminary application on the maintainability of a Section 36A(3) Maharashtra Public Trust Act application was disposed of on the petitioners' request: they may withdraw it with liberty to press their maintainability and locus objections at the hearing of the main application, all contentions remaining open and uninfluenced by the impugned order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vasantdada Patil Pratisthan Trust Mumbai and Ors. Vs… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

34-WP-4495-2023.docx

¶2

rrpillai

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4495 OF 2023

¶4

Vasantdada Patil Pratisthan Trust

¶5

… Petitioners

¶6

Mumbai and Others

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Nandkumar M. Katkar and Another … Respondents

¶9

Mr. Yogesh Naidu a/w. Mr. Parul Abhyankar for the Petitioner. Ms. Y. S. Jahagirdar, Senior Counsel a/w. Mr. Amar Parsekar for Respondent No. 1.

¶10

Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr Shantanu Raktate for Respondent No. 2.

¶11

Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the State.

¶12

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 16^th FEBRUARY 2024

¶13

P.C.

¶14

This petition challenges order dated 10^th March 2023 passed

¶15

below Exhibit 22 filed in Application No. 10 of 2023 praying to decide

¶16

the issue of maintainability of the application under Section 36A(3) of

¶17

The Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (“MPT Act”). By the impugned

¶18

order the said application at Exhibit 22 filed by the petitioners is rejected.

¶19

Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.02.21 17:22:48 +0530

¶20

1/3

¶21

RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI

¶22

 34-WP-4495-2023.docx

¶23

The main application is filed by the respondents under Section 36A(3) of the MPT Act praying for sanction to take loan. The said application is still pending.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions submits that the issue of maintainability raised by the petitioners in their application at Exhibit 22 may be directed to be decided alongwith all the issues in the main application. He submits that if the said issue is kept open to be decided along with the other issues in the main application, the petitioners would not press this petition. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection for the said liberty being granted.

¶25

Hence, the petition is disposed of by passing following order :

¶26

(i) The petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise the issue of maintainability of Application No. 10 of 2023 and locus of the respondents alongwith other issues at the time of deciding the main application.

¶27

2/3

¶28

 34-WP-4495-2023.docx

¶29

(ii) Leave as prayed is granted with liberty to the petitioners to raise their objections in terms of their application at Exhibit 22 at the time of hearing of the Application No. 10 of 2023.

¶30

(iii) Hence, the contentions of all parties in terms of application at Exhibit 22 to be decided alongwith other issues in the Application No. 10 of 2023, uninfluenced by the reasons recorded in the impugned order.

¶31

(iv) It is clarified that I have not examined the rival contentions of the parties on merits, hence all contentions of all parties are kept open.

¶32

(v) Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶33

[GAURI GODSE, J.]

¶34

3/3

Vasantdada Patil Pratisthan Trust Mumbai and Ors. v. Nandkumar M Katkar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vasantdada Patil Pratisthan Trust Mumbai and Ors. v. Nandkumar M Katkar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rukminibai Narayan Mhatre (Decd.)-Moreshwar N.Mhatre (Decd.)by Lrs.- Ramesh Moreshwar Mhatre and or Vs Sadanand Raghunath Gharat

Shankar Tatya Karle through Legal Heirs vs Balu Babu Karle through His Legal Heirs

Sunil Mahavir Kakade vs Reshma Sunil Kakade

Nisar Ismail Waghoo Vs Mazgaon Kokani Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.

Shraddha Shahoo Gaikwad and Anr. Vs the Divisional Joint Registrar Co. Op Soc and Ors.

Radha Soami Satsang Beas through Atul Rameshchandra Mody Vs Gajanan Sukur Patil and Ors.