Anushka Mukund Kakad v. the Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawn at the petitioner's request before hearing; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 wp10970-24.doc
Digitally signed by TRUSHA TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2024.08.23 11:40:28 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10970 OF 2024.
Miss Anushka Mukund Kakad .. Petitioner
Versus
The Union of Indian and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Govind Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Niranjan Shimpi, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Rui Rodrigues, Advocate for Respondent No.2 and 3.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: AUGUST 22, 2024
P. C.
withdrawn.
3. No order as to costs.
Page 1 of 2 AUGUST 22, 2024
Mohite
18 wp10970-24.doc
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 AUGUST 22, 2024
Mohite
Miss Anushka Mukund Kakad
The Union of Indian and Ors.
B. P. Colabawalla
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court