Disposed

Kiran Balkrushna Ughade and Anr. v. the Ld. Presiding Officer, Parents and Sr Citizen Tribunal Alias Dy Collector , Mumbai Div. and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Sept 2024WP/10928/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged proceedings before the Parents and Senior Citizens Tribunal. Following a Division Bench ruling that Section 16 appeal lies for children and relatives, the petition was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file appeal within two weeks; interim stay extended for two weeks.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kiran Balkrushna Ughade and Anr. vs the Ld… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AS:47972

¶2

89wp10928-24

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.10928 OF 2024

¶5

Kiran Balkrushna Ughade and Anr. ... Petitioners. Versus The Ld. Presiding Officer, Parents and Sr.Citizen Tribunal alias Dy.Collector, Mumbai Divn. and Ors. ... Respondents.

¶6

Mr. H.D. Chavan for the Petitioners. Mr. Hamid D. Mulla, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶7

—————

¶8

Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : December 09, 2024

¶9

P. C. :

¶10

1. Preliminary is objection raised by the learned AGP in view of

¶11

the alternate remedy which is available to the Petitioner under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (“Senior Citizens Act”). The issue has been settled by the Division Bench of this Court (Aurangabad Bench) in the case of Jagdish Pitamber Pawar vs. Pitamber Pundalik Pawar and Ors. in Writ Petition No.36 of 2023 , holding that the remedy under Section 16 of the Senior Citizens Act is available to the children and relatives.

¶12

2. In light of alternate remedy available to the Petitioner, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the

1 of 2

sa_mandawgad

89wp10928-24

Petition to file appropriate Appeal before the Appellate Authority. Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶17

3. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the Petition and as such, all rights and contentions of the parties are expressly kept open. While considering the aspect of delay, pendency of the present Petition may be taken into consideration.

¶18

4. Let the Appeal be filed within a period of two weeks from today. The interim relief which was granted by order dated 19^th August, 2024 staying the impugned order, is extended for a period of two weeks. It is thereafter open for the Appellate Authority to consider the extension of the interim relief on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶19

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

¶20

2 of 2

¶21

Signed by: Sanjay A. Mandawgad Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 10/12/2024 18:51:17

Kiran Balkrushna Ughade and Anr. v. the Ld. Presiding Officer, Parents and Sr Citizen Tribunal Alias Dy Collector , Mumbai Div. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kiran Balkrushna Ughade and Anr. v. the Ld. Presiding Officer, Parents and Sr Citizen Tribunal Alias Dy Collector , Mumbai Div. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shrimant Govind Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Asif Ali Siddiquie vs Dr.Gaikwad Varsha Eknath

Dinu Pascal Borne (Deceased) Thr. L.R.S. 1.1) Zenokamal D Borne vs Nicholai D'Souza and Ors.

Govind Maruti Pawar Since Decd. Thr. Lrs vs Ramdas Sadashiv Zugar and Ors.

Mr. Maruti Shankar Teli and Ors. vs Mr. Dagadu Yashwant Dhere and Ors.

Marvel Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. Throu. Its Managing Director Vishwajeet S Pawar vs State of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader and Ors.