Writ petition withdrawn on a praecipe filed by the petitioners' counsel; no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1091 OF 2024
Sakharam Laxman Raut (Since Deceased), Through LRs : Parigha Sakharam Raut & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through the District Collector, Pune & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Uddhav Katkar, i/by Mr. Abhishek Matkar, Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 7TH OCTOBER 2024.
P.C. :
In view of the praecipe filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHAABHAY 6-WP-1091-2024.doc ABHAY DIXIT DIXIT Date:2024.10.07 Dixit 14:51:18 +0530
1/1
Sakharam Laxman Raut (Since Deceased), Through LRs : Parigha Sakharam Raut & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra, Through the District Collector, Pune & Ors.
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
