Laxmibai Mangal Page v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a writ petition; the matter was listed on request of petitioner's counsel, and the Registry was directed to accept Respondent No. 6's reply already served.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-OSWP-1024-2024.DOC
Ashwini
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1024 OF 2024
Laxmibai Mangal Page …Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors ...Respondents
Mr Afsar Ansari , i/b Hemant Ganekar, for the Petitioner.
Mr Mayur Khandeparkar , with Pooja Kane, i/b Jitendra Jain, for Respondent No. 6.
Ms Usha Rahi, AGP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: M.S. Sonak &
Kamal Khata, JJ
DATED: 3rd October 2024
PC:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Laxmibai Mangal Page
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 6
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court