Petitioner sought expeditious consideration of a pending representation before the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Niphad for benefit under Section 44A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court directed submission of additional documents and adjudication within set timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10166 OF 2024
Sitaram Kisan Rokade .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi, i/by Mr. Ajinkya Taskar, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Rajpurohit, Assistant Government Pleader for the RespondentState of Maharashtra.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2024.
P.C. :
consideration of his representation dated 9th October 2023 that has been made before the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Niphad. The petitioner seeks to obtain benefit under Section 44A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
be adjudicated, the following directions would serve the ends of justice :-
Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Niphad the additional documents to support the prayers made in
1/2
8-WP-10166-2024-Corrected Order Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt.6-9-2024.doc
Dixit
the writ petition. The same be done within a period of four weeks from today.
8-WP-10166-2024-Corrected Order Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt.6-9-2024.doc
2/2
Dixit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Assistant Registrar should adjudicate petitioner's representation seeking benefit under Section 44A within a specified timeframe?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sitaram Kisan Rokade
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
