Writ petition challenging a common order disposing of applications in land acquisition proceedings was dismissed solely on the ground of unexplained delay of about three years; the excuse that the petitioner did not know the consequences of the order was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.wp.1013.24.odt
1
2024:BHC-NAG:1722
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1013 OF 2024
Manorama Vilas Kasture .Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Sub Divisional Officer, Wardha & Ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri R.C. Rathi, Adv. a/w Shri K.J. Topale, Adv. for petitioner. Shri A.J. Gohokar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1/State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 12/02/2024
JUDGE
C.L. Dhakate
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a 2021 order should be entertained despite a delay of about three years with no sufficient explanation for laches.
Manorama Vilas Kasture
Land Acquisition Officer and Sub Divisional Officer, Wardha
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
