Disposed

Shrishti Complex Sector-Iii Co-Operative Housing Societies Association Ltd. v. the Competent Authority and Dist Dey Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Thane and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Aug 2024WP/10113/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged a deemed conveyance order granted to Respondent No.2, seeking admission and interim relief mirroring an already-admitted connected writ petition filed by the Developer. The court issued Rule, ordered interim relief in terms of specific prayer clauses, and set returnable date.

What did the court decide?

Rule issued; interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (c) and (d) of WP 10113/24 and prayer clause (c) of WP 10111/24, returnable 21 January 2025.

Shrishti Complex Sector-Iii Co-Operative Housing… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

72 Wp-10111-24 & 10113-24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 10111 OF 2024

¶4

Shrishti Complex Sector III Co-operative Housing Societies Association Ltd.

¶5

...Petitioner.

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thane and Others.

¶8

...Respondents.

¶9

AND

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 10113 OF 2024

¶11

Shrishti Complex Sector III Co-operative Housing Societies Association Ltd.

¶12

...Petitioner.

¶13

Versus

¶14

The Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Thane and Others.

¶15

...Respondents.

¶16

Mr. Amogh Singh, Mr. Santosh Pathak, Mr. Kailash Patil and Mr Chirag Thakur i/b Law Origin for the Petitioner.

¶17

Mr. Sunny Shah, Mr. Viral D. Shukla, Ms. Priti Shukla, Rudra M. Dani i/b Shukla and Associates for the Respondent No. 5 in WP 10111/24 and for the Respondent No. 2 in WP 10113/24.

¶18

Mr. Makarand B.Savant for the Respondent No. 2 and 3 in WP 10111/24 and for the Respondent No. 6 and 7 in WP 10113/24.

¶19

Ms. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶20

——————

¶21

Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : November 26, 2024.

¶22

[Corrected order as per Speaking to Minutes Order dtd 2-12-2024] 1 of 3

¶23

Patil-SR

¶24

72 Wp-10111-24 & 10113-24.doc

¶25

P. C. :

¶26

1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the connected writ petition, i.e., Writ Petition No. 5520 of 2023, which has been filed by the Developer has been admitted by order dated 26^th April 2024 and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer Clauses (b-2) and (b-

¶27

of the said petition has been granted, which read thus :

¶28

“(b-2) That pending the hearing and final disposal of Writ Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to restrain the Respondent No. 2 and its members, servants, agents, employees of office bearers acting through or for and on behalf of the Respondent No. 2, from selling, transferring, dealing with and/or encumbering, creating any third party rights and/or alienating in any manner whatsoever, the property purportedly conveyed under the alleged Deed of Deemed Conveyance bearing Registration No.2408/2023 dated 12.04.2024.

¶29

(b-3) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the Writ Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to restrain the Respondent No. 10 and 11 from making any changes in the relevant revenue records, i.e., 7/12 extracts, Village From No.6 and Village Form No.8A on basis of the alleged Deed of Deemed Conveyance bearing Registration No.2408/2023 dated 12.04.2023.”

¶30

2. He submits that as the Petition No. 10113 of 2024 challenges the same order dated 27^th March 2023 of grant of deemed conveyance to the Respondent No. 2, the present petitions may be admitted and the same interim relief may be granted.

¶31

3. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2 would oppose the grant of interim relief in the present petitions by contending that the grounds on which impugned order is challenged by

¶32

[Corrected order as per Speaking to Minutes Order dtd 2-12-2024] Patil-SR 2 of 3

¶33

72 Wp-10111-24 & 10113-24.doc

¶34

the Developer are distinct from the grounds on which the present Petitioner-Federation, which is part of the same lay-out has, challenged the impugned order in the instant petitions.

¶35

4. Perusal of the prayers in Writ Petition No. 5520 of 2023 and the Writ Petition No. 10113 of 2024 would indicate that the same order of Competent Authority dated 27^th March 2023 granting deemed conveyance to the Respondent No. 2 herein has been challenged. As the connected petition is already admitted, Rule in Writ Petition No. 10111 of 2024 and 10113 of 2024.

¶36

5. Considering that there is already an ad-interim relief granted in the connected Writ Petition No. 5520 of 2023, Rule on interim relief in the instant petitions in terms of prayer Clauses (c) and (d) of Writ Petition No. 10113 of 2024 and in terms of prayer Clause (c) in Writ Petition No. 10111 of 2024, made returnable on 21^st January, 2025.

¶37

6. As there was already ad-interim relief in the connected writ petition, there is no necessity for grant of ad-interim relief in the present Petitions. Respondent No.2 is at liberty to file affidavit opposing the grant of interim relief.

¶38

7. List on 21^st January, 2025 along with Writ Petition No. 5520 of 2023.

¶39

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]

¶40

[Corrected order as per Speaking to Minutes Order dtd 2-12-2024] 3 of 3

¶41

Patil-SR

¶42

Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 03/12/2024 18:08:33

Shrishti Complex Sector-Iii Co-Operative Housing Societies Association Ltd. v. the Competent Authority and Dist Dey Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Thane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrishti Complex Sector-Iii Co-Operative Housing Societies Association Ltd. v. the Competent Authority and Dist Dey Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Thane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Gti Infotel Private Limited vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited through Chairman and Managing Director

Bhumi Geen Energy Thr. Partner Pankaj R. Pasalkar vs City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Thr. Managing Director and Ors.

Irfan Yasin Qureshi vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Imrana S/O Mahiboob Shaikh vs Mohammad Ishaq Ahmad Somani and Anr.

Kendriya Bhandar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Dept.

Gunina Commercials Pvt. Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Food Civil Supplies and Consumer