Disposed

Foram Rasbihari Desai Alias Foram Desai A.K.A. Foram Payak v. Sharmela Remesh Iyer

Bombay HC5 Aug 2024TS/148/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Testamentary suit resolved amicably through Consent Terms executed by the parties, which were taken on record and admitted by all parties. The suit was decreed in accordance with the Consent Terms; a probate petition and two caveats were disposed of as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

Foram Rasbihari Desai Alias Foram Desai A.K.A… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

901-TS148-2024.DOC

¶2

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI

¶3

Santosh

¶4

Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.08.07 18:32:16 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶6

TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 148 OF 2024

¶7

Foram Rasbihari Desai ...Plaintiff

¶8

Versus

¶9

Sharmela Iyer

¶10

Nikhil Iyer …Defendants

¶11

Mr. Aditya Raut, a/w Shaymdhar Upadhyay, i/b Desai Desai Carrimjee & Mulla, for the Plaintiff.

¶12

Ms. Simantini Mohite, a/w Robin Fernandes, Sukrit Parashar and Adrianna Lillyan Thangkhiew, i/b Vesta Legal, for the Defendants/Ori. Caveators.

¶13

CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 6^th AUGUST, 2024

¶14

PC:-

¶15

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶16

The learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and have also executed the Consent Terms.

¶17

The learned Counsel for the parties seek leave to tender the Consent Terms.

¶18

Foram Rasbihari Desai, the plaintiff, is present before the

¶19

Court. Sharmela Iyer and Nikhil Iyer, Defendant Nos.1 and 2, are present before the Court through Video Conferencing. The

¶20

plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 and 2 submit that they have

¶21

executed the Consent Terms.

¶22

1/2

¶23

901-TS148-2024.DOC

¶24

Upon being enquired, the plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 and 2 state that they have read and understood the contents of the Consent Terms and they admit the same. The parties admit the execution of the Consent Terms and their signatures thereon. They are identified by their respective Advocates.

¶25

Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X”.

¶26

TS/148/2024 stands decreed in accordance with the Consent Terms (X).

¶27

The Consent Terms (X) shall form part and parcel of the decree.

¶28

TP/482/2021 stands disposed as withdrawn. The Caveats filed by the defendants being Caveat (L) No.15418 of 2021 and Caveat (L) No.15420 of 2021 also stand disposed as withdrawn.

¶29

Defendant No.1 has agreed not to implement the grant of Letters Administration dated 28^th September, 2020 in TP/2834/2019.

¶30

The rest of the undertakings in the Consent Terms (X) are accepted as the undertakings to the Court.

¶31

All concerned to act on the basis of this order.

¶32

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]

¶33

2/2

Foram Rasbihari Desai Alias Foram Desai A.K.A. Foram Payak v. Sharmela Remesh Iyer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Foram Rasbihari Desai Alias Foram Desai A.K.A. Foram Payak v. Sharmela Remesh Iyer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dinesh Mehta Vs the Custodian and Others

Birahadsiddha Devasthan Thr Trustee vs Joint Charity Commissioner Kolhapur and Ors.

Om Namay Shivay Logistics International Pvt. Ltd. vs Raycon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Kunal Suresh Anandani vs Anandani Pushpa Arjandas (Deceased)

Nitin Hiralal Parikh vs Chandrakant Hiralal Parikh and 5 Ors.

Villoo Mehernoz Maloo vs Sonoo Phiroze Narsang (Deceased)