Allowed

Krishna Gangaram Sawant v. Shreeram Gangaram Sawant Deceased

Bombay HC25 Sept 2024TP/613/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Probate petition by a legatee for Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the estate of Shreeram Gangaram Sawant. Attesting witness affidavit proved execution; citation drew no objection. Petition granted and Letters of Administration directed to be issued after administration bond verification.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration with Will annexed granted, subject to administration bond execution and check for cross petition or caveat.

Krishna Gangaram Sawant vs Shreeram Gangaram… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 80.TP/613/2024

¶2

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date: 05th December, 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/613/2024 [Original] (ECHCBM021717220 23) with WILL/255/2024

¶5

P. C. : Shri. Shubham Upadhyay Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner

¶6

1) This petition is filed by petitioner, being one of the beneficiaries under the Will executed by Shreeram Gangaram Sawant (herein after the same is referred to as “Testator”, for grant of a Letters of Administration with Will annexed. Said Testator said to have died at Mumbai on 2901-2023 Petitioner, namely KRISHNA GANGARAM SAWANT, filed the copy of death certificate, identity proof of the testator, Will along with its office translation, petitioner's oath.

¶7

2) Perused petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. Perused documents.

¶8

3) Hence, the petitioner is the one of the legatees under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable.

¶9

4) Petitioner stated that the deceased left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 13.10.2022, in Marathi language. its office translation are filed on the record in view of the Order of the Hon’ble Court passed in the TP No. 1263/2023, the Ld. Advocate for the petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that the translation of the Will is true translation as per the contents of the Original Will. The original Will is handed in separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

¶10

5) Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that parents of deceased predeceased testator and testator was survived by legal heir, as per the provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Legal

¶11

2 80.TP/613/2024

¶12

heir of the testator has consented to the petition and thereby waived the service of Citation. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased.

¶13

6) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶14

7) The petitioner has filed the affidavit of Sunil Ramchandra Chavan one of Attesting Witnesses to the Will, in form No.102 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. He deposed that he was present and deceased signed the Testament in presence of him and another witness, after going through its contents. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will. According to him all additions and alteration in a Will were existed at the time of execution and before singing the Will. Hence, there is sufficient compliance of the Rule 383 of the Rules.

¶15

8) Properties mentioned in the schedule-I of the petition are referred in the Will as well as in residuals clause of the Will.

¶16

9) P etitioner has executed the administration Bond in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

¶17

ORDER

¶18

3 80.TP/613/2024

¶19

1) Petition is granted.

¶20

2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, upon satisfaction that the administration Bond is properly executed, as per the Rules, thought State of Maharashtra.

¶21

3) Before issuance of Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

¶22

05th December, 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Krishna Gangaram Sawant v. Shreeram Gangaram Sawant Deceased

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Gangaram Sawant v. Shreeram Gangaram Sawant Deceased

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amrik Singh Mangat vs Hardev Kaur Mangat (Deceased)

Mahesh Vitthal Bagwe vs Suhasini Balkrishna Parab (Deceased)

Geeta Mithu Hundalani vs Mithu Ghanshamdas Hundalani (Deceased)

Sudeep Ramrao Sinkar vs Ramrao Ganesh Sinkar

Pravin Shantilal Shah vs Shantilal Sukhlal Shah (Decased)

Digvijay Arunkumar Singh vs Arundhati Arunkumar Singh Alias Arundhatisingh (Deceased)