Allowed

Revaben Mafatlal Panchal v. Mafatlal Gangaram Panchal Alias Panchal Mafatlal G (Deceased)

Bombay HC11 Mar 2024TP/58/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Widow's uncontested petition for Letters of Administration over properties of her deceased husband, with heirs' consents filed. Court found facts on oath unchallenged and granted Letters of Administration subject to verification of administration bond and absence of caveat or cross-petition.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted to the petitioner over the scheduled properties, subject to office verification of no caveat/cross-petition and proper execution of administration bond.

Revaben Mafatlal Panchal vs Mafatlal Gangaram… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 53.TP/58/2024

¶2

Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 11th March, 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/58/2024 P. Shri. Umeshchandra Tiwari Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner C. : (ECHCBM021827 82023) 1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration,

¶5

This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”) for the properties left by the deceased, namely Mafatlal Gangaram Panchal alias Panchal Mafatlal G. (For short “Said deceased”). The petitioner, namely Revaben Mafatlal Panchal, has filed documents such as true copy of the death certificates of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format.

¶6

I have heard Ld. Advocate and perused the petition along with the documents. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that he has uploaded administration bond online having document no. EDHCBM02092442024 and affidavit of service online having document no. EDHCBM02123892024.

¶7

Said deceased died on 01/08/2021 at Bhavisana, Palampur (B.K.), Banas Kantha, Gujarat, leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule.

¶8

Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation

¶9

2 53.TP/58/2024

¶10

pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

¶11

Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. They have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, inter-se.

¶12

Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

¶13

Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Wife of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

¶14

ORDER

¶15

1. Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925

¶16

1. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶17

1. The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner’s Oath within stipulated period. Office to verify that an Administration Bond is properly executed and uploaded.

¶18

11th March, 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Revaben Mafatlal Panchal v. Mafatlal Gangaram Panchal Alias Panchal Mafatlal G (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Revaben Mafatlal Panchal v. Mafatlal Gangaram Panchal Alias Panchal Mafatlal G (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jessy Mammen Joseph vs (I) Late Punnaseril Mathew Abraham (Deceased)

Ayesha Ashraf Chougle vs Nishat Fatima Yusuf Shaikh (Deceased)

Jaya Shivkrishnakumar Dighe vs Shikrishnakumar Digambar Dighe (Deceased)

Nilesh Ramesh Naik vs Shirley Ramesh Naik (Deceased)

Tarun Parasmal Jain vs Parasmal Nemichand Jain (Deceased)

Appa Dondi Sawant Alias Appa Dhondiba Sawant vs Dhondiba Daulat Sawant Alias Dhondiba Daulata Sawant Alias D D Sawant(Deceased)