Allowed

Sanjay Raghunath Andurlekar v. Manorama Raghunath Andurlekar Alias M R Andurlekar

Bombay HC2 Mar 2024TP/553/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uncontested petition under the Indian Succession Act for Letters of Administration for the estate of Manorama Raghunath Andurlekar by her son and daughter. Citation expired without objection; legal heirs consented. Petition allowed with administration bond and office verification conditions.

What did the court decide?

Letters of Administration granted to petitioners for the deceased's scheduled properties, subject to office verification and filing of account per oath.

Sanjay Raghunath Andurlekar vs Manorama Raghunath… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 38.TP/553/2024

¶2

Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 11th June 2024

¶3

FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶4

TP/553/2024 P. C. Shri. Rahul Jathar Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner [Original] : (ECHCBM022269 1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, 92023)

¶5

This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short “IS Act”) for the properties left by the deceased, namely Manorama Raghunath Andurlekar alias M. R. Andurlekar(For short “Said deceased”). The petitioners, namely (1) Sanjay Raghunath Andurlekar, (2) Jyoti Subhash Narvankar, have filed documents such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, affidavit with document to dispense with requisition of identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

¶6

I have heard Ld. Advocate and perused the petition along with the documents.

¶7

Said deceased died Widow on 17-01-2002 at Mumbai leaving behind her legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioners state that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules. 4) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon’ble High Court and notice board of the Collector’s Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short “BHC Rules”) and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is

¶8

2 38.TP/553/2024

¶9

treated as uncontested one.

¶10

Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. They have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, inter-se.

¶11

Petitioners have filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

¶12

Ld. Advocate for the petitioners submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner No.1 being son and no. 2 being daughter of the deceased, are entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

¶13

ORDER

¶14

1. Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioners for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

¶15

1. Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

¶16

1. The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner’s Oath within stipulated period. Necessary endorsement be made on the administration Bond, subject to satisfaction of the Department.

¶17

11th June 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Sanjay Raghunath Andurlekar v. Manorama Raghunath Andurlekar Alias M R Andurlekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Raghunath Andurlekar v. Manorama Raghunath Andurlekar Alias M R Andurlekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Krishnakant Vasantlal Minawala vs Kantaben Vasantlal Minawala Alias Kanta v. Minawala (Deceased)

Shaheen Kauser through Poa Holder Ajit Jude Ireanus Lobo vs Hussain Baksh Alias Husain Buksh Alias Mola Baksh

Anil Jaysinh Ashar vs Jaysinh Ramjee Ashar (Deceased)

Purnima Rajesh Meshram vs Rajesh Ganpatrao Meshram (Deceased)

Vidya Vinay Bhat vs Vinay Vishnu Bhat

Vijayshree Yeshwant Worlikar vs Indu Yashwant Worlikar