Dismissed

Surendra Shamrao Thombre v. Bhimarav Krishna Thombare alias Thombare Bhimarav (Deceased)

Bombay HC11 Dec 2024TP/5513/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Officer on Special Duty dismissed a petition for letters of administration filed by a Class-II Entry-(IV) legal heir. The court held that in the absence of Class-I heirs, the property devolved to Class-II heirs. Since a Class-II Entry-(II) heir was alive, the petitioner lacked precedence. The petition was directed to be pursued via appropriate court proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed; the petitioner was directed to take steps according to law by filing in the appropriate court.

Surendra Shamrao Thombre vs Bhimarav Krishna… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 11^th December, 2024

¶2

FOR ISSUANCE OF CITATION :

¶3

TP/5513/2024 P.C. : Shri. GUPTA DHRUV VEDPRAKASH Ld. Advocate for the (AMH2024000728 Petitioner 0C202400007)

¶4

Perused Petition. Petition is filed for the Letters of Administration namely Bhimarav Krishna Thombare alias Thombare Bhimarav, who died married on 31.03.2015. His Widow, namely Babai Bhimarav Thombare, died on 16.12.2022. The petitioner is the nephew of the deceased namely, Surendra Shamrao Thombre.

¶5

In present petition, soon after the death of the deceased, the property devolved upon the widow Babai Bhimarav Thombare, being the widow and Class-I heir of the deceased. She died on 16.12.2022. Hence, in life time of Said Babai, the petitioner or any other class-II legal heirs could not have a right of inheritance for the properties left by the deceased.

¶6

However, after death of said Babai Bhimarav Thombare (on 16.12.2022), the said property/properties further devolved upon the heirs of the said Babai, in view of Sec. 15(1)(a) of HS Act. From the petition, it appears that there are no legal heirs falling under Section 15(1)(a) of HS Act.

¶7

Therefore, to ascertain the heirs of the deceased after the death of the his widow, Rule 3 of Section 16 of the HS Act, is applicable. According to this Rule, to ascertain the heirs of the husband of the female, it has to be assumed that soon after the death of the female, her husband dies. Hence, after the death of widow, persons who are alive and comes as per the entry given in the Class-II, as provided in the schedule annexed to the HS Act, can claim an inheritance. Hence, on 16.12.2022 in a petition, only class-II, Entry (ii) heir (i.e. brother of the deceased) can claim the inheritance as per Sec. 9 of the HS Act.

¶8

Under such circumstances, as per the Section 15(1) (b) read with Rule-3 of Sec. 16 along with

¶9

Section 9 of HS Act , only Narayan who falls under the Class-II, Entry-(II) legal heir can claim inheritance to properties of the deceased. Petitioner and others persons, whose names are mentioned at serial no. 2(b) to 2(d) and 3(a) to 3(d) comes at Entry-IV in Class-II legal heirs. Therefore, class-II entry-II heir, only Narayan have the preference, excluding the heirs fallen under subsequent entry.

¶10

Even otherwise, for sake of discussion, the date of the death of the deceased is considered, then Shamrao predeceased to the deceased and therefore, in life time of Class-II, Entry(II) Legal heirs, Class-II, Entry(IV) legal heirs from the schedule of the HS Act do not have preference over to Class-II, Entry(II) legal heirs. However, as mentioned herein above, in life time of the widow of the deceased, no other than her had a right of inheritance to the properties left by the deceased.

¶11

The petitioner comes under Class-II, Entry-(IV) legal heirs as per the Schedule annexed to the HS Act. Hence, in life time of the brother of the deceased (Class-II, Entry-(II)), capacity of the petitioner to present the petition comes in question. Hence, Petitioner to satisfy about his capacity.

¶12

Now at this juncture, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner is relied upon the Order passed by the Hon’ble Court in TP(L)/25555/2023, on 30.11.2023. In the said Petition, the Hon’ble Court considering the circumstance of the petition, granted the relief to the petitioner. However, such authority and powers are vested with the Hon’ble Court and not with this authority. Hence, petitioner to take steps as per the law.

¶13

S. O. to 14.01.2025

¶14

11.12.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Surendra Shamrao Thombre v. Bhimarav Krishna Thombare alias Thombare Bhimarav (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Shamrao Thombre v. Bhimarav Krishna Thombare alias Thombare Bhimarav (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Laxman Digambar Dalvi vs Dattaram Laxamn Dalvi (Deceased)

Audrey Sylvia Karkada vs Praveen Kumar Karkada (Deceased)

Pradeep Gopal Zantye vs Sudha Gopal Zantye

Chetan Vijay Shedge vs Bhalchandra Nathu Patil

Mythili Chandrasekar vs S Chandrasekaran

Bharti Atul Vadodaria vs Baboobhai Kanjibhai Mistry