Disposed

Pradeep Gopal Zantye v. Sudha Gopal Zantye

Bombay HC5 Mar 2024TP/528/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Testamentary petition compliance order permitting amendment of the probate petition schedule to add bank-sourced properties mentioned in the Will, dispensing with re-verification, and directing deposit of Rs. 20,000/- against a bequest for investment by the Prothonotary and Senior Master.

What did the court decide?

Praecipe allowed; amendment of Schedule-I within three weeks; permission to deposit Rs. 20,000/- against bequest for investment by Prothonotary and Senior Master.

Pradeep Gopal Zantye vs Sudha Gopal Zantye — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :-10^th December, 2024

¶2

FOR COMPLIANCE :

¶3

80. TP/528/2024 [Original] P. C. :	Shri. P. G. Sawant Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner
(ECHCBM02118652023) WITH WILL/242/2024	1. Read praecipe dated 10.12.2024, Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner and he seeks permission to amend the schedule-I, para no. 7 and 11 as certain information has been collected from the bank which are required to be added in the petition. Petitioner has filed the affidavit in this regard. Perused said affidavit and document annexed to it. These properties are mentioned in the Will and therefore, these are required to be included in the petition. Submission is accepted. Praecipe is allowed. In view of the additional affidavit of the petitioner, re-verification is dispensed with. 2. Petitioner to carryout an amendment within three weeks from the date of uploading of this order, if petition is pending.
	3. Furthermore, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner moved a praecipe and thereby requested to allow him to deposit the sum of Rs. 20,000/-against the bequest given to Anagha Umesh Mantri as per the Will. Submission is accepted. Petitioner to deposit the amount with the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, Original Side, High Court, Bombay and upload its acknowledgment on the portal. Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay, to invest the same in nationalized bank for a period of one year and thereafter renew the same from time to time . Hence, adjourned. 4. S. O. to 17.01.2025

80. TP/528/2024
[Original]
P. C. :

Shri. P. G. Sawant Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner

(ECHCBM02118652023)
WITH
WILL/242/2024

1. Read praecipe dated 10.12.2024, Ld. Advocate for
the Petitioner and he seeks permission to amend the
schedule-I, para no. 7 and 11 as certain information
has been collected from the bank which are required
to be added in the petition. Petitioner has filed the
affidavit in this regard. Perused said affidavit and
document annexed to it. These properties are
mentioned in the Will and therefore, these are
required to be included in the petition. Submission
is accepted. Praecipe is allowed. In view of the
additional affidavit of the petitioner, re-verification
is dispensed with.
2. Petitioner to carryout an amendment within three
weeks from the date of uploading of this order, if
petition is pending.

3. Furthermore, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner
moved a praecipe and thereby requested to allow
him to deposit the sum of Rs. 20,000/-against the
bequest given to Anagha Umesh Mantri as per the
Will. Submission is accepted. Petitioner to deposit
the amount with the Office of the Prothonotary and
Senior Master, Original Side, High Court, Bombay
and upload its acknowledgment on the portal. Office
of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court,
Bombay, to invest the same in nationalized bank for
a period of one year and thereafter renew the same
from time to time . Hence, adjourned.
4. S. O. to 17.01.2025

¶4

10.12.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

Pradeep Gopal Zantye v. Sudha Gopal Zantye

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Gopal Zantye v. Sudha Gopal Zantye

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Uma Kiran Inamdar vs Late Kiran Ganesh Inamdar Deceased

Shivraman Veeraraghavan S/O Veeraraghavan vs Ramchandra Krishnamurthy @ R. Krishnamurthy

Abbas Tyebji Dahodwala vs Husenabai Tayebji Dahodwala (Deceased)

Salman Shujatali Fazalbhoy vs Hilton Infrastructure 52/53

Bharvi Samir Dave and Anr. vs Nalin Mohanlal Dave (Deceased)

Sumeet Srikishin Shroff vs Srikishin Chellaram Shroff (Deceased)