Sadanand Hariram Kurmi v. Hariram Pachu Kurmi (Deceased)
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR DATE: 17th October, 2024
CALLED FOR DIRECTION :
Sr. No. 16, TP-4905-2024 (AMH20230049678C202400004) None present for parties.
- Perused Petition. This petition is for Succession Certificate in respect of certain debts belonging to the deceased viz. Hariram Pachu Kurmi, who died at Uttar Pradesh on 02.03.2023. Copy of death certificate is annexed at Exhibit- ‘A’ to the petition. Copy of Identification proof of deceased is already annexed at Exhibit- ‘B’ to the petition. Relation of petitioner with the deceased is not mentioned in the cause title. Advocate for petitioner is permitted to correct the same. Re-verification dispensed with. Identification proof is not legible, Advocate for petitioner is directed to annex legible identification proof.
- Upon perusal of petition, it is noticed that the deceased was resident of Mumbai and had gone to his native place at the time of his death of the Deceased. Deceased residential address at, The B /31, Sainath Society, Mohili Village, Behind Wilson Hotel Sakinaka Mumbai - 400072, and/or left property within Greater Bombay and in the State of Maharashtra.
- Upon perusal of petition, it is noticed that the legal heirs left behind the deceased surviving as his only heirs next-of-kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 are mentioned in para no. 4 of the said petition.
- Upon perusal of petition, it is noticed that the said deceased died intestate and that due and diligent search has been made for Will but none has been found.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajay
- other
Hariram Pachu Kurmi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court