Jatin Mahendra Parekh v. Mahendra Hansraj Parekh (Deceased)
Bombay HCTP/4892/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 09th December, 2024
¶2
FOR COMPLIANCE :
¶3
| 92. TP/4892/2024 [Original] (ECHCBM02105662024) |
P. C. : | Ms. Adv |
Madhuri Lakhani i/b Sudhakhar Lakhanai Ld. ocate for the Petitioner |
|---|---|---|---|
| with WILL/1949/2024 |
1. 2. |
Firstly ,the Petitioner to point out what property is bequeathed to the petitioner under the Will and thus he is a legatee under the said Will. Upon satisfaction of above requisition ,the petitioner to state about marital status of the deceased. |
|
| 3. 4. 5. |
Petitioner to file affidavit of attesting witnesses and Comply Rule 383 of BHC Rules, Petitioner to execute bond for Gross Amount, Petitioner to File consent of Legal Heirs of the deceased and Beneficiary/legatees, under the Will. |
||
| 6. 7. |
Petitioner to correct the amount in the administration Bond and file same for gross amount as per the form no. 118 r/w Rule 420 of the Bombay High Court (O. S.) Rules, 1980. Furthermore, corrections must be initialed by the petitioner, surety and notary. Hence, adjourned. S. O. to 07.01.2025 |
||
| 09.12.2024 |
Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department |
Coram
AI extract
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court