Neeta Preetam Sippy v. Ghanshyam Hasmatrai Daryani
Bombay HCTP/446/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Procedural compliance listing only; no substantive decision of general application. The petitioner's advocate was absent and the matter was adjourned to a later date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1 TP 1787 of 2024
¶2
BEFORE : MRS. R. V. RANE COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR
¶3
DATE : 9th September’2024.
¶4
Sr. No. - 15 -TP/446/2024 (ECHCBM02186962023)
¶5
None for the petitioner.
¶6
For Compliance
¶7
Advocate for the petitioner is absent. List the matter on 30.09.2024.
¶8
COMPANY REGISTRAR / TESTAMENTARY REGISTRAR
Coram
AI extract
R. V. Rane
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court