Disposed

Ajay Nandlal Pachisia v. Indira Nandlal Pachisia (Deceased)

Bombay HC18 Apr 2024TP/1/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Probate petition for the registered last Will of a deceased who died at Mumbai, filed by her sole executor. Consent affidavits of four sons, attesting witness affidavit, death certificate and service citation were on record. The Registrar granted the petition and directed issuance of probate after verifying no cross petition or caveat.

What did the court decide?

Petition granted; office to issue probate as prayed after verifying no cross petition or caveat.

Ajay Nandlal Pachisia vs Indira Nandlal Pachisia… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

ary

¶2

Before: Shri S. S. Agate

¶3

Addl. Registrar (O.S.) / Addl. Prothonotary and Senior Master

¶4

Date : 18^th April, 2024.

¶5

CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE:

¶6

TP/1/2024

¶7

) Mr. M. S. Lad, Advocate for the Petitioner. )

¶8

)

¶9

) P.C.: 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for

¶10

) the Petitioner. This Petition is for Probate of

¶11

) ) Last Will and Testament of the deceased filed ) by the Petitioner Ajay Nandlal Pachisia being

¶12

) the Sole Executor named under the Will of the

¶13

) ) deceased. Deceased Indira Nandlal Pachisia ) said to have died at Mumbai on 27.02.2021. ) Copy of death certificate is annexed to the

¶14

) ) Petition. Identification proof of the deceased ) i.e. copy of Aadhar Card is annexed to the ) Petition.

¶15

) Petition. ) ) ) 2. Mr. Lad, Advocate for the Petitioner submits ) that deceased left behind her last Will and ) Testament which was duly executed and ) registered at Mumbai on 18.02.2021. The said ) ) Will is in English language. ) ) 3. Mr. Lad, Advocate for the Petitioner ) submits that deceased was governed under the ) ) Hindu Succession Act 1956. It is submitted ) that the parents of the deceased predeceased ) the deceased. The deceased has no daughter ) and has no any other son. Save and except as ) ) mentioned in para – 9, there are no other legal ) heirs left by the deceased. ) ) 4. Petitioner’s Oath is filed. Consent ) Affidavits of four sons of the deceased ) ) mentioned in para – 9 are on record. Affidavit ) of Shrikant Jayantilal Kanabar, one of the )

¶16

Petitioner’s Oath is filed. Consent Affidavits of four sons of the deceased mentioned in para – 9 are on record. Affidavit of Shrikant Jayantilal Kanabar, one of the attesting witness to the Will is filed. Affidavit

¶17

) of service of General Citation is filed. All other ) legal formalities are complied with. Hence, ) Petition is granted. ) ) ) 5. Office to issue Probate as prayed after ) verifying whether any Cross Petition or Caveat ) is filed. ) ) ) ) ) )

¶18

Addl. Registrar (O.S.) /

¶19

Addl. Prothonotary and Senior Master

¶20

18.04.2024

Ajay Nandlal Pachisia v. Indira Nandlal Pachisia (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Nandlal Pachisia v. Indira Nandlal Pachisia (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sameer Laxman Rao vs Sunandini Laxman Rao (Deceased)

Sandip Yaswant Redij vs Yaswant Dharmaraj Redij (Deceased)

Arun Florentius Dcunha vs Sonia Louisa Alva Wife of Arun Florentius Dcunha (Deceased)

Srishti Chetty D/O. Sriram Chetty vs Sriram Chetty S/O. Venkat Rathnam Ampabattuni

Lalit Kumar Son of Krishan Chander Kumar Vs Swadeshlata Krishan Chander Kumar - Deceased

Prakash Nanajibhai Parmar vs Nanji Giga Parmar (Deceased)