Swati Rajendra Dave v. Rajendra Bhagwandas Dave
Bombay HCTP/1657/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Testamentary petition compliance proceeding: advocate reported uploading of service affidavit, consent affidavits and administration bond; office directed to approve documents and petitioner to file consent or serve citation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 06th August, 2024
¶2
FOR COMPLIANCE :
¶3
- TP/1657/2024 P. C. : Shri. S U Lakdawala i/b Lakdawala & Co. Ld. [Original] Advocate for the Petitioner (ECHCBM02215802023)
¶4
- Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that he has uploaded affidavit of service online having document no. EDHCBM02322872024, consent affidavit of Abhishek and pooja having document no. EDHCBM02322632024, consent affidavit of Nishit and Amit having document no. EDHCBM02322652024.
¶5
- Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that he has uploaded the administration bond for gross amount as per form no. 118 r/w Rule 420 and true copy of the Schedule-I for issuance of Notice to Collector as per Rule 396 of the Bombay High Court (O. S.) Rules, 1980. However, it is not displayed in the CIS. Hence, the office to approve these documents, if these documents are found in order as per Rules.
¶6
- Petitioner to file consent of Kishor or take steps to serve the citation.
¶7
- S. O. to 28.08.2024
¶8
06.08.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department
Coram
AI extract
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court