A legatee sought Letters of Administration with the Will annexed after the sole Executor renounced executorship; the petition was amended from Probate to Letters of Administration. Attesting witnesses' affidavits proved execution of the Will; consents of legal heirs were on record. Compliance matters were directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SLG
BEFORE : MR. DILIP S. GURAV, FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER Date: 9th October, 2024
CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE :
17 TP/1616/2024 )
)
Ms. Mrunalini Panchal i/b. PS Legal, Advocate for petitioner
)
) P.C.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
) ) ) )
)
)
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. This petition is fled by petitioner, being legatee i named under the Will executed by M T Kochukunju (herein after the same is referred to as “Testator”), for grant of a Letters of Administration with Will annexed. Testator said to have died on 09.05.2023 at Mumbai. Petitioner f i led the copy of death certif i cate (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit- A ), identity proof of the testator (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit- A1), Will, petitioner's oath, Afdavits of legal heirs of the testator. fi
2. The petitioner has f i led petition within prescribe d limit as per Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980 (for short “Rules”).
3. The testator has appointed one Mr. K. C. Thomas (Kootampallil) as Executor of his Will. The said Executor has renounced his rights, title and interest of f i ling of Probate. He has f i led his Afdavit dated fi 23.01.2024, which is on record. Hence, petitioner is being one of the legatees named under the Will, is entitled to f i le the present the petition .
Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that since sole Executor namely K. C. Thomas has renounced his rights of executorship. This petition is f i led by one of the legatees named under the Will. However, earlier this petition was f i led for Probate and not Letters of Administration with Will. Hence, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment on 29.07.2024 and amended this petition from Probate to Letters of Administration with Will. Also, Administrator’s oath has been corrected accordingly.
…….2
SLG
CONTD….
– 2 –
Ld. Advocate for the petitioner undertakes to hand over the Administrator’s oath to the Registry to keep the same alongwith the Will in a safe place in the Ofce of the fi Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay. The said undertaking is accepted. Ofce to verify. fi
4. Petitioner stated that the testator left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 24.05.2021, in English language. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that the original Will No. 607 of 2024 is handed in separately for being f i led and kept in a safe place in the Ofce of the Prothonotary and Senior fi Master, High Court, Bombay.
5. Petitioner states that parents of testator were predeceased to him and testator was survived by legal heirs shown in the paragraph No. 8 of the petition, as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applicable to Christians. Testator died leaving behind Sosamma Kochukunju – petitioner herein, Mukaladdyil Kochukunju Thomas - son, Mukaladdyil Kochunkunju Varghese - son, Mariamma Santosh Daniel – married daughter. Consent Afdavits of Mukaladdyil fi Kochukunju Thomas, Mukaladdyil Kochunkunju Varghese, Mariamma Santosh Daniel all dated 23.01.2024 are on record. Also, fresh Consent Afdavits fi of Mukaladdyil Kochukunju Thomas dated 07.10.2024, Mukaladdyil Kochunkunju Varghese dated 08.10.2024, Mariamma Santosh Daniel dated 05.10.2024 are also on record as earlier Consents were taken for Probate and not for Letters of Administration with Will. They have given their consents in the form of Afdavits, which are f fi i led on the record by the petitioner and consented for the issuance of Letters of Administration with Will annexed in favour of the petitioner without justifying any surety in respect of their shares in the estate of the testator. They have waived the service of Citation. The petitioner afrmed that there are no other legal heirs of the fi testator other than mentioned in para No. 8 of the petition.
6. Afdavit of Service of General Citation is f fi i led, stating that citation has been afxed on the Notice Board fi
SLG
CONTD….
of the Hon’ble High Court, Bombay and notice …... 3
– 3 –
board of the Collector’s ofce on 11.09.2024. Ld. fi Advocate for petitioner f i led Afdavit of Service of Atul fi Madhukar Shimpi, Advocate Clerk dated 11.09.2024. He stated on that the citation dated 09.09.2024 has been displayed on the Notice of Board of Hon’ble Bombay High Court and Collector’s ofce on 11.09.2024. Ld. fi Advocate for the petitioner to upload corrected Afdavit fi of Service by correcting year “2024” instead of “2014” in the said Afdavit. fi Notice to collector has been sent.
7. The petitioner has f i led the Afdavits of fi Dr. Verghese Mathew and Ketan Jaisukhlal Gandhi both dated 23.01.2024 , both are being Attesting Witnesses to the Will, in the Form No.102 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Attesting Witnesses deposed that they were present and testator signed on the Testament papers in presence of both of them. According to them, all additions and alteration, in a Will, were existed at the time of execution and before signing the Will. Hence, there is sufcient compliance of fi the Rule 383 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 . They further deposed that at the time of execution of the Will, testator was of sound and disposing mind, memory and understanding. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will.
8. Properties mentioned in the schedule of the petition are referred in the Will. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that as mentioned in relevant para No. 6 of the petition, which reads as under :
“That the Petitioner has truly set forth in Schedule – I hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit – “C” the details of immovable property which the deceased possessed of or entitled to at the time of his death, which have or are likely to come to her hands”.
The Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that properties available to the testator at the time of his
SLG
CONTD….
death are mentioned in the Schedule– I of the petition.
09.10.2024 FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a legatee under a Will whose executor has renounced executorship is entitled to Letters of Administration with Will annexed.
Whether sufficient evidence exists to establish due execution of the Testator's Will.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Sosamma Kochukunju
M T Kochukunju (Testator)
Dilip S. Gurav
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
