Anup Sadashiv Uppoor v. Sharada Sadashiv Uppoor
Bombay HCTP/1467/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court directed the office to issue a General Citation and notice to the Collector within two weeks in multiple testamentary petitions. Advocates were directed to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting heirs as per the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
ary
¶2
Before: Shri S. S. Agate Addl. Registrar (O.S.) / Addl. Prothonotary and Senior Master
¶3
Date : 23rd April, 2024.
¶4
CALLED FOR DIRECTION (FOR ISSUANCE OF CITATION):
¶5
- TP/1467/2024 ) Ms. Rashmi Shah i/b MZD Legal, Advocate for the (ECHCBM02012132024) ) Petitioner. ) 31. TP/1468/2024 ) Mr. Prabhu Velar, Advocate for the Petitioner. (ECHCBM02016832024) ) ) 32. TP/1469/2024 ) M. S. Bane, Advocate for the Petitioner. (ECHCBM02223202023) ) ) 33. TP/1470/2024 ) Mr. Yunus Memon, Advocate for the Petitioner. ) (ECHCBM02131702023) ) ) 34. TP/1473/2024 Mr. Navin P. Sachanandani, Advocate for the Petitioner. ) (ECHCBM02067832023) ) ) 35. TP/1475/2024 S. B. Trivedi i/b Vimadalal & Co., Advocate for the ) (ECHCBM02228392023) Petitioner. ) ) 37. TP/1480/2024 Mr. Subhash Khade, Advocate for the Petitioner. ) (ECHCBM02114992023) ) ) 38. TP/1492/2024 Mr. Suraj Naik i/b Atmaram Patade, Advocate for the ) (ECHCBM02203152023) ) Petitioner. ) ) P.C.: 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for ) the Petitioners. Office to issue Citation within ) ) two weeks from today and also issue Notice ) to the Collector. Advocates are directed to ) take steps. )
¶6
)
¶7
)
¶8
- ) 2. Advocate to file Affidavit of Service of ) General Citation within one week thereafter
¶9
- ) ) and also effect service upon non-consenting ) heirs, if any as per Rules 399 and 400 of the
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
MZD Legal
- petitioner
Prabhu Velar
- petitioner
M. S. Bane
- petitioner
Yunus Memon
- petitioner
Navin P. Sachanandani
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court