Veena Mohinder Lamba v. Mohinder Kumar Inderlal Lamba
Bombay HCTP/1174/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A compliance-side listing in a testamentary petition: the surety to the administration bond declined to continue, and the petitioner sought time to furnish a fresh administration bond; the matter was adjourned.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment granted to furnish fresh administration bond; next date 22.11.2024.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
| Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 11thOctober, 2024 |
||
|---|---|---|
| FOR COMPLIANCE: | ||
| 24. TP/1174/2024 [Original] (ECHCBM02223952023) |
P. C. : | Ms. Bijal Gogri i/b Gogari & Associates Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner 1. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that, surety to the administration bond does not willing to continue with the said administration bond. Therefore, petitioner seeks time to furnish fresh administration bond. Hence, adjourned. |
| 2. S. O. to 22.11.2024 | ||
| 11.10.2024 |
Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rani Hashmit Rachwani vs Trilochansigh Ujjagaer Singh Chugh Alias Trilochan Singh Chaug (Deceased 1)
Lalita Shantaram Gurav vs Shantaram Jairam Gurav (Deceased)
Mohd. Abdul Qayyum Shaikh S/O. Abdul Kader Mohd Vazir Shaikh vs Abdul Kadar Mohd. Vazir Shaikh Alias Abdulkadar Mahamadwajir Shaikh (Deceased)
Anand Raghunath Ganu vs Raghunath Vishnu Ganu(Deceased)