) ) P.C.: 1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. ) This petition is fled by petitioner, being i sole legatee ) named under the Will executed by Manohar Atmaram ) Oraskar (herein after the same is referred to as ) “Testator”), for grant of Letters of Administration with ) Will annexed. Testator said to have died on 22.02.2021 ) at Mumbai. Petitioner f i led the copy of death certif i cate ) (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit- A ), identity ) proof of the testator (which is annexed to petition as ) Exhibit-A1), Will, petitioner's oath, Afdavits of legal fi ) heirs of the testator. ) 2. The petitioner has f i led the present petition within ) prescribed limit as per Rule 382 of the Bombay High ) Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980 (for short “Rules”). ) ) 3. The testator has not appointed Executor to execute ) the Will. The petitioner is being sole legatee named ) under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable. ) 4. Petitioner stated that the testator left behind his lastPetitioner stated that the testator left behind his last ) ) Will and Testament which was duly executed at ) Mumbai on 08.07.2019, in Marathi language. Ldon 08.07.2019, in Marathi language. Ld08.07.2019, in Marathi language. Ld, in Marathi language. LdMarathi language. Ldlanguage. Ld . ) Advocate for petitioner submits that the original Willhe original Will ) No. 347 of 2024 is handed in separately for being fis handed in separately for being f i led ) and kept in a safe place in the Ofce of thece of the fi ) Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay. ) L d. Advocate for petitioner has f. Advocate for petitioner has f i led his Afdavit dateddavit dated fi ) 19.10.2024 which is on record. He deposed that he ) knows both the languages i.e. Marathi and English and ) he had translated the Will from Marathi to English ) which is true and correct. Hence, there is sufcientcient fi ) compliance of order dated 10.01.2024 passed by the ) Hon’ble Court in Testamentary Petition No. 1263 of
