Appeal and pending civil application dismissed for non-prosecution.
Second appeal No. 636 of 1998 and Civil Application No. 10988 of 1998 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
9-sa-636-1998.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 636 OF 1998 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10988 OF 1998
Mahesh Narayan Wagh and Ors. ..Appellants Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents
Ms. Smita Gaidhani, for the Appellants. None for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. M. L. Patil, for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 14 FEBRUARY 2024
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.02.1417:42:22+0530
P.C.
. Earlier also none appeared for the appellants and the matter was posted for dismissal. Today, Ms. Smita Gaidhani, learned counsel appears for the appellants and seeks an adjournment on the count that the papers are not with her and as such she is unable to argue the matter. It is not possible to give adjournment on such ground. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Pending application also stands disposed of.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Mahesh Narayan Wagh and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
