Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the appellant on two consecutive occasions; pending civil applications disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-sa-620-2004.doc
MAMTA AMAR KALE
Digitally signed byMAMTA AMAR KALEDate: 2024.02.0717:09:13 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 620 OF 2004
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2009
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2009
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 920 OF 2010 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 921 OF 2010 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2009 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 113 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 697 OF 2004 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 620 OF 2004
Laxman Dhaku Vast ..Appellant
Vs.
Kashiram @ Kashinath Dhaku Vast (Since Deceased) through LRs. & Ors. ..Respondents
None for the Appellant. Mr. A. R. Shaikh, for the Respondents.
page 1 of 2
Mamta Kale
1-sa-620-2004.doc
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 7 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 2 of 2
Mamta Kale
Laxman Dhaku Vast
Kashiram @ Kashinath Dhaku Vast (Since Deceased) through LRs. & Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
