The Second Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellants failed to appear for over two decades. Some appeals abated due to the death of appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2024.02.07 10:12:25+0530
2.sa325-95.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.325 OF 1995
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3055 OF 1995 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.325 OF 1995
Govind Zeparu Mangela (Deceased) Through His LRS And Ors.
...Appellants
vs. Govind Kashinath Chaudhari (Deceased) Through His LRS. ...Respondents
None for the Appellants.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 6 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
. The office noting shows that this appeal stands abated as against deceased appellant nos 1A, 4A, 4B and 2.
1 / 2
2.sa325-95.doc
sg
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Second Appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants?
Govind Zeparu Mangela (Deceased) Through His LRS And Ors.
Govind Kashinath Chaudhari (Deceased) Through His LRS.
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court