Adjournment order only. The Bombay High Court stood over Second Appeal No. 614 of 2024 and an interim application to 11/02/2025 due to paucity of time. Existing ad-interim or interim relief was continued till the next date; relief granted without a limited period remains unaffected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-58
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 614 OF 2024
Nanda Madhukar Mirajkar Through Her Power ....APPELLANT Of Attorney Ashok Balkrishna Tavse
V/S
Mohiddin Tainul Jamadar ....RESPONDENT
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 13693 OF 2024
In
Second Appeal 614 OF 2024
Nanda Madhukar Mirajkar Through Her Power ....PETITIONER Of Attorney Ashok Balkrishna Tavse V/S
Mohiddin Tainul Jamadar ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE J DATE : 22nd October, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time.Stand Over to 11/02/2025 If any ad-interim / interim relief is operating till today, the same shall continue to operate till the next date. If ad-interim/ interim relief is granted not for a limited period, the same shall remain unaffected.
Page 1/2
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 2/2
Nanda Madhukar Mirajkar Through Her Power Of Attorney Ashok Balkrishna Tavse
Mohiddin Tainul Jamadar
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
