Disposed

Ganapati Aanna Sapate v. Rajaram Bapu Patil Since Deceased through Legal Heirs and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Dec 2024SA/583/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar refused registration of appeal due to non-removal of office objections despite prior grace period. One final opportunity of two weeks granted to remove objections, failing which registration would stand refused.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time granted to remove office objections; registration to stand refused if failed.

Ganapati Aanna Sapate vs Rajaram Bapu Patil Since Deceased through Legal Heirs and Ors. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.17296 OF 2024

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders	Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) DATE : 12^thSeptember, 2024 None present. The above numbered Second Appeal (Stamp) is listed on the board of Registrar for second time. Already, two weeks time
has been granted, however, despite
granting two weeks time, the office
objections are not removed. In view of provisions under Chapter V,
Rule 3(ii), the Advocates/Parties are
expected to remove the office objections within 14 days from the date of notification. Rule (5) further provides that, if the fi
office objections are not removed as
provided under Rule 3, the office shall place the matter before the Registrar, who shall
refuse the registration of all such matters.

¶5

As such, prescribed time to remove the office objections as provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to non removal of office objections. However, instead of passing order of refusal of registration outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to remove the office objections. In turn, 02 (two) weeks time is granted with directions to remove the office objections without fail. On failure, registration would stand refused, without further reference to the Court of Registrar. No further extension will be granted. sd/Registrar (Judl. - II) amr

Ganapati Aanna Sapate v. Rajaram Bapu Patil Since Deceased through Legal Heirs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganapati Aanna Sapate v. Rajaram Bapu Patil Since Deceased through Legal Heirs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raju Patil vs the Election Commission of India

Jotiba Pandurang Gavade vs Gramsevak Grampanchayat

Kamalakant Shiivram Malandkar(Since Deceased vs Rekha Krishna Achrekar

Anjali Anil Dardi and Anr. vs the Government of Mahaarashtra Thr the District Collector and Ors.

Uttam Dnyanu More vs Nivrutti Nana Gavale Since Deceased through Legal Heirs

Bharat Lalu Bhai Jani and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr G.P and Ors.