The High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, admitted a plea of settlement between parties and allowed the withdrawal of the second appeal and condoned delay for adding legal heirs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-sa552.18.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 225 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2018
Shankar Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Sonyabapu s/o Shankar Adhav & others Applicants
Versus
Malhari Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Rangnath Malhari Adhav & others Respondents
Mr. V. S. Bedre, advocate for the Applicants
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 04th January, 2024
PC :
Heard learned Counsel for the applicants.
The applicants-appellants are seeking permission to bring names of legal heirs of deceased applicant-appellant no.1A Sonyabapu Shankar Adhav on record by condoning delay of 755 days.
It appears that the parties have settled their dispute out of Court and today the appellants are going to file pursis for withdrawal of the appeal.
{2} 2-sa552.18.odt
In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, it stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses {B} and {C}. Applicants-appellants to carry out the amendment forthwith.
Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE
adb
2-sa552.18.odt
{3}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2018
Shankar Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Sonyabapu s/o Shankar Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. & others Appellants
Versus
Malhari Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Rangnath Malhari Adhav & others
Respondents
Mr. V. S. Bedre, advocate for the Appellants
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 04th January, 2024
PC :
The learned Counsel for the appellants produced on record pursis of all the appellants mentioning that they don’t want to proceed with the appeal. According to the learned Counsel for the appellants, parties have settled their dispute amicably out of Court.
2 In view of the same, said pursis is taken on record
and marked “X” for identification.
2-sa552.18.odt
{4}
3 Accordingly, Second Appeal stands disposed of as
withdrawn. Pending C. A. No. 8670 of 2018 also stands
disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE
adb
Shankar Laxman Adhav
Malhari Laxman Adhav
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
