Disposed

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu and Others v. Malhari Laxman Adhav Lrs Rangnath and Others

Bombay HC4 Jan 2024CA/8670/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed the applicants to condone delay in bringing legal heirs on record. Subsequently, the Court disposed of the pending civil application and second appeal upon the parties settling their dispute and filing pursis for withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Pursis for withdrawal of appeal and amendment of record accepted. Civil Application and Second Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu and Others Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2-sa552.18.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 225 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2018

¶5

Shankar Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Sonyabapu s/o Shankar Adhav & others Applicants

¶6

Versus

¶7

Malhari Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Rangnath Malhari Adhav & others Respondents

¶8

Mr. V. S. Bedre, advocate for the Applicants

¶9

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

¶10

DATE : 04^th January, 2024

¶11

PC :

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants.

¶13

The applicants-appellants are seeking permission to bring names of legal heirs of deceased applicant-appellant no.1A Sonyabapu Shankar Adhav on record by condoning delay of 755 days.

¶14

It appears that the parties have settled their dispute out of Court and today the appellants are going to file pursis for withdrawal of the appeal.

¶15

{2} 2-sa552.18.odt

¶16

In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, it stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses {B} and {C}. Applicants-appellants to carry out the amendment forthwith.

¶17

Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE

adb

2-sa552.18.odt

{3}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶23

SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2018

¶24

Shankar Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Sonyabapu s/o Shankar Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. & others Appellants

¶25

Versus

¶26

Malhari Laxman Adhav (deceased) through L.Rs. Rangnath Malhari Adhav & others

¶27

Respondents

¶28

Mr. V. S. Bedre, advocate for the Appellants

¶29

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

¶30

DATE : 04^th January, 2024

¶31

PC :

¶32

The learned Counsel for the appellants produced on record pursis of all the appellants mentioning that they don’t want to proceed with the appeal. According to the learned Counsel for the appellants, parties have settled their dispute amicably out of Court.

¶33

2 In view of the same, said pursis is taken on record

¶34

and marked “X” for identification.

¶35

2-sa552.18.odt

¶36

{4}

¶37

3 Accordingly, Second Appeal stands disposed of as

¶38

withdrawn. Pending C. A. No. 8670 of 2018 also stands

¶39

disposed of.

¶40

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE

¶41

adb

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu and Others v. Malhari Laxman Adhav Lrs Rangnath and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu and Others v. Malhari Laxman Adhav Lrs Rangnath and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Isaq Syed Ahmed Saudagar Vs Saleha Begum Sayed Ejaz Husain and Another

Rekha Harish Jain Vs Harish Jagdishchandra Jain

Rekha Harish Jain Vs Harish Jagdishchandra Jain

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu L.Rs. Bhamabai and Others Vs Malhari Laxman Adhav Lrs Rangnath and Others

Shankar Laxman Adhav Lrs Sonyabapu and Others Vs Malhari Laxman Adhav Lrs Rangnath and Others

Punamchand Kachrusing Bahure Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another